🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold action to ban social networking access for individuals under sixteen is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are monitoring closely to see if this approach will become a template for other nations.

The European Trend

Throughout Europe, a rising chorus of states are considering comparable bans.

• The Danish government plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and platforms are "stealing our youngsters' innocence". The policy may be formalized next year.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to shield young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to verify the user details of social media users. Authorities have indicated that an Australian-model ban could be "an options in reserve".
• In Spain, the leader has called on lawmakers to enact a proposal lifting the minimum age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a similar step, including an overnight "digital curfew" for adolescents.
• The administration in the Netherlands has advised guardians to restrict their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the European parliament has passed a symbolic resolution supporting a ban for minors except if parental consent is granted. Even though it highlights of the "habit-forming" quality of these apps, the resolution does not enact binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a solid foundation," said the parliamentarian behind the initiative.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Approach

In the UK, the government has remained open to a possible ban, stating that "no option is being dismissed" but insisting any policy must be "supported by robust research".

Last year, support gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was eventually modified. However, the government pledged to conduct more studies the topic.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. An organization set up by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material argues that a simple age ban might not improve online safety and could create a "sudden drop-off" of risk when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design platforms and apps that are secure and age appropriate for minors," said a prominent online safety campaigner.

The United States: A Fragmented Picture

In the United States, regulation is largely happening at the regional level amid national inaction.

• Utah requires parental consent for those under 18 to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law barring under-14s from creating accounts on social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting minors to one hour of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to set up social media accounts.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from various figures to follow this example, a nationwide ban is currently seen as improbable.

International Perspectives

Beyond these regions, additional countries are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government aims to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the required age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international organizations strike a more nuanced stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "could prove counterproductive". The organization notes that online platforms can be a "vital connection" for isolated children and that government action should not be a "replacement" for platform operators to invest in safety.

As this global conversation unfolds, the policies of this nation and its followers show that governments around the world are less and less willing to delay for platforms to self-regulate.